Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 4G LTE Specification

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 4G LTE: A Retrospective Look

Samsung galaxy ace 3 4g lte specification – The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 4G LTE, released in 2013, represented Samsung’s effort to provide affordable 4G connectivity in a budget-friendly smartphone. This article delves into its specifications, performance, and overall user experience, offering a comparative analysis with similar devices of its era.

The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 4G LTE, while a budget-friendly option, had comparatively modest specifications. Its 4G capabilities were a notable feature for its time, but comparing its performance to a more advanced model like the samsung galaxy a7 specification 2016 reveals a significant generational leap in processing power and screen resolution. Returning to the Ace 3, understanding its limitations helps appreciate the advancements made in subsequent Samsung models.

Device Overview, Samsung galaxy ace 3 4g lte specification

The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 4G LTE targeted budget-conscious consumers seeking access to 4G LTE networks. It positioned itself as an entry-level device within Samsung’s extensive smartphone portfolio, offering a balance of affordability and essential features. While not a flagship device, it aimed to provide a satisfactory user experience for basic tasks and internet browsing.

Model	Processor	RAM	Storage	Screen Size
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 4G LTE	1.2 GHz dual-core	1 GB	8 GB (expandable)	4.0 inches
HTC Desire 500	1.2 GHz quad-core	1 GB	4 GB (expandable)	4.3 inches
Motorola Moto G (1st gen)	1.2 GHz quad-core	1 GB	8 GB (expandable)	4.5 inches
LG L90 Dual	1.2 GHz dual-core	1 GB	4 GB (expandable)	4.7 inches

Technical Specifications

The Galaxy Ace 3 4G LTE featured a 1.2 GHz dual-core processor, which provided adequate performance for everyday tasks like browsing, messaging, and light gaming. While not exceptionally powerful, it generally handled these tasks without significant lag. The 1 GB of RAM was standard for budget devices at the time, sufficient for multitasking but limited compared to higher-end models.

Internal storage of 8 GB was complemented by microSD card support, allowing users to expand storage capacity significantly.

The 4.0-inch display, likely an LCD panel, offered a resolution suitable for its size. While not high-resolution by today’s standards, the display likely provided acceptable visual clarity for basic tasks, with adequate brightness and color reproduction for its price point. However, viewing angles and outdoor visibility were probably less impressive than more advanced displays.

Camera Capabilities

The rear camera specifications, likely around 5 megapixels with autofocus, were typical for budget smartphones in 2013. Image quality would have been satisfactory in well-lit conditions, but struggled in low light. The front camera, likely a VGA or low-megapixel sensor, was sufficient for basic video calls but lacked the resolution and features of modern selfie cameras.

• Image quality: Acceptable in good lighting, but grainy and lacking detail in low light.
• Video recording: Basic video recording capabilities, suitable for short clips but not high-quality footage.
• Front camera: Adequate for video calls, but low resolution limited image quality.

Connectivity and Network

The 4G LTE support was a key selling point, offering faster data speeds compared to 3G networks. The specific LTE frequencies supported would have varied depending on the region of sale. In addition to 4G LTE, the device included standard connectivity options like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and potentially NFC, although the latter was not always standard on budget devices of that era.

Compared to current-generation smartphones, its network capabilities were significantly slower and less feature-rich, lacking the support for newer, faster cellular technologies and Wi-Fi standards.

Software and User Interface

The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 4G LTE launched with Android 4.x (likely Jelly Bean), featuring Samsung’s TouchWiz UI overlay. While TouchWiz was often criticized for its bloatware and less streamlined design compared to stock Android, it offered some customization options. Compared to modern Android versions, the user experience would feel noticeably slower, less visually appealing, and lacking many of the features and optimizations found in newer versions.

Battery Life and Performance

The battery capacity was likely around 1500-2000 mAh, providing a typical usage time of a single day on a moderate usage pattern. Overall performance was adequate for everyday use, but heavier tasks or multitasking could lead to some lag. Heavy gaming would have been particularly challenging.

• Users often reported satisfactory battery life for light to moderate use.
• Some users experienced performance slowdowns with multiple apps running concurrently.
• Battery life was generally considered acceptable for its class, but not exceptional.

Physical Design and Ergonomics

The phone likely featured a plastic build, typical for budget devices. Its dimensions and weight were probably compact and comfortable to hold, making it suitable for one-handed use. The design would have been relatively simple, focusing on functionality over premium aesthetics. The overall ergonomics were likely quite good for its size and intended use, offering a user-friendly experience for basic tasks.

Q&A: Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 4g Lte Specification

Was the Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 4G LTE water resistant?

No, the Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 4G LTE did not offer any water resistance features.

Did the phone support expandable storage via microSD?

Yes, it supported expandable storage via microSD card.

What was the typical battery life on a single charge?

Battery life varied based on usage, but user reports generally indicated a single-day battery life under moderate use.

What were the main criticisms of the phone?

Common criticisms included a relatively low-resolution display and occasional performance lag during multitasking.